San Diego’s hometown fast food chain is coming apart from every direction at once. Jack in the Box is closing 200 of its 2,200 locations, losing a proxy fight with an activist investor, dumping its Del Taco acquisition, and posting same-store sales declines of 4% to 7% per quarter. The stock has lost half its value in a year.
That’s a lot of bad news for a single company. But the way this is unfolding tells a bigger story about what happens when corporate leadership loses the plot, and it creates very specific opportunities for people paying attention to restaurant real estate in Southern California.
The Biglari Problem
Sardar Biglari, who controls a 9.9% stake in Jack in the Box through Biglari Capital, is waging a campaign to oust board chair David Goebel at the company’s upcoming shareholder meeting. Biglari calls Goebel’s tenure a “17-year losing streak” marked by “catastrophic value destruction.” He points specifically to the Del Taco acquisition as a “fiasco.”
The company fired back, arguing Biglari’s campaign is driven by personal grievance after being denied a board seat, not genuine shareholder interest. They called his public statements a “smear campaign.” Biglari then sued in Delaware Chancery Court, alleging the company adopted a “poison pill” to block his influence.
Two of the three major proxy advisory firms, Glass Lewis and Egan-Jones, are siding with Biglari. ISS is recommending shareholders keep Goebel. The vote is coming at the end of March.
Whatever your opinion of Biglari, the underlying numbers support his frustration. Same-store sales declined 4.4%, 7.1%, and 7.4% in Jack in the Box’s last three reported quarters. That’s not a soft patch, it’s a structural problem.
200 Locations and Counting
The closure plan, branded internally as “JACK on Track,” targets about 10% of the total footprint. The first 80 to 100 underperformers were supposed to be shuttered by the end of 2025, with the remainder closing over the next 18 months. The company expects the closures and related property sales to generate roughly $300 million.
These aren’t random locations. They’re concentrated on the West Coast, which means California, which means the San Diego and broader SoCal markets are directly in the path of these closures.
At the same time, Jack in the Box is actively trying to sell Del Taco, which it acquired in 2021 for what the market has since concluded was too much money. That puts hundreds of additional QSR locations into play across California.
What This Looks Like from the Brokerage Side
When a chain goes through this kind of contraction, the immediate effect is a wave of built-out restaurant spaces hitting the market. These aren’t raw shells. They come with commercial kitchens, ventilation systems, grease traps, drive-through infrastructure, and in many cases existing lease terms that a new operator can assume.
For restaurant buyers in SoCal, that’s real value. Building out a QSR location from scratch can cost $500,000 to over $1 million depending on the market. A second-generation space from a closing Jack in the Box or Del Taco unit compresses that cost significantly.
But the opportunity goes beyond just real estate. When a franchisor is in distress, franchise resales often trade at a discount. Franchisees who’ve been watching their corporate parent implode may be highly motivated sellers. The question for buyers is whether the brand itself still has enough consumer pull to justify the franchise model, or whether the smarter play is converting the space to an independent concept.
Given the traffic numbers Jack in the Box is posting, I’d lean toward the independent conversion in most cases. A well-located drive-through space in a SoCal suburb has value regardless of what sign is out front.
The Bigger Pattern
Jack in the Box isn’t alone in this. Wendy’s is closing 150 to 300 locations. Denny’s just went private for $620 million after shedding over 100 restaurants in two years. The QSR and casual dining segments are both in contraction mode, shedding underperformers while trying to stabilize the surviving units.
For the restaurant brokerage market, this creates a two-speed environment. Corporate chains are pulling back, shrinking footprints, and generating a steady flow of available locations. Meanwhile, independent operators and small multi-unit groups are expanding into the gaps. That dynamic is particularly strong in Southern California, where consumer preference for local, distinctive dining concepts continues to outpace the national chains.
What to Watch
The Jack in the Box shareholder vote at the end of March will determine whether Goebel keeps his seat. If Biglari’s campaign succeeds, expect more aggressive restructuring, potentially faster closures, and possibly a Del Taco sale at a steep discount. If the current board holds, the “JACK on Track” plan continues as outlined, but the underlying sales decline doesn’t fix itself with a boardroom win.
Either way, the closures are happening. The real estate is coming to market. And the question for buyers isn’t whether there’s opportunity here, it’s which locations are worth picking up and what you do with them once you have the keys.
If you’re tracking QSR locations in San Diego or Orange County, this is worth watching closely over the next six months.
Businesses Mentioned